08 July 2012

mindlessness

Among other broader definitions, I describe mindfulness in my 24 June post as “an attentive awareness of the reality of things, especially of the present moment.” Although mindfulness is certainly a good thing, I wouldn’t want to suggest that its opposite, mindlessness, is always a bad thing.

Surely the mind needs a holiday every now and again; it can’t always be On. Some of the best mindlessness occurs when one is totally immersed in some or other activity, looks at the clock and exclaims, “Holy fuck! Is it four-thirty?” (In the morning.) Total engagement in one thing can mean complete obliviousness to all else. This is a fine state.

I’ve engaged in a bit of mind-numbing over the years, usually involving a nice number or two, or three. Losing one’s mind, of course, is an altogether different matter, not recommended.

For many people mindlessness comes naturally. These people are inadvertists, people who persistently fail to take notice of things. Ammon Shea describes them in his Reading the OED as people who “stumble through life seemingly with no other purpose than to make it difficult for the rest of us.”

These are people who wear headphones while walking aimlessly on bike paths so no bell can disturb them. They stand at the front of a long queues at ticket counters asking about train departures two months from now. They get rid of all their small coins at the 12-items-or-less check-out at the supermarket. You get the picture.

Mindlessness ought be a private pursuit. Total immersion in a favourite activity to the exclusion of all else: private. Smoking enough joints to be totally mind-fucked: private. Reverie, idle contemplation to no particular end: private. Public mindlessness, inadvertism, is unconscionable.

Unlike those to whom mindlessness comes naturally, I need artificial stupefacients to achieve it. Having given up THC, I’m left with a mind that won’t turn off. Anywhere, anytime, it’s churning away, turning things over, big and small, and five senses sucking up everything in their purview.

Ah, well …

Rock on. 

No comments: