My father is now 87 and I am 60.
When my son is 60, I’ll be 87.
All my family believes
passionately in the right to die as and when we choose. None of us has yet confronted
death, but we consider contingencies. We all hope to die in our sleep, or
quickly, with dignity.
At the weekend I read an essay
by an American author about his 86 year-old mother, trapped in a broken body
and demented mind. Although attended around the clock by devoted caregivers, “she
stares in mute reprimand. Her bewilderment and resignation don’t mitigate her
anger.”
A doctor fully informs his
mother before operating on her heart that the surgery could exacerbate her
dementia, but now “she can live for years.” Her son is gobsmacked: “You fully
informed my demented mum?”
Dementia, he says, is not absence,
not a non-state; it’s a condition of more, not less, feeling, and without
clarity or logic, a living nightmare. It reduces the quality of life for the
sufferer and their family to zilch. But politicians and half the medical
profession lack both the wit and courage to allow the painless and dignified
departures we accord our pets.
I blame the church, of course,
the Catholic church most of all; the sanctified and sanctimonious from whom
there is no sanctuary. And those emotional and spiritual troglodytes calling
themselves right-to-lifers.
My father is declining, but not
yet in the words of one doctor, a dwindler, devoid of real life but somehow
still breathing. He might or might not make 90. His father and both brothers
carked it in their sixties, so he’s done well.
For myself, I hope I’ve a long
way to go. I’d like to see my son reach 60, my grand-daughter nearly 30. I’m
hoping to have some say in my departure from this place. If legislation does
not enshrine that right, I hope I have the wits to organise to go quickly in
the middle of a pleasant dream.
Rock on.
No comments:
Post a Comment