The increase in part-time and casual
jobs means workers will construct incomes from work modules. At lunch the other
day Andrew tells me he has three jobs—two days a week at a southern community
health service, one day at an eastern service, and two days lecturing at a
university.
So far I’ve applied for one full-time
job. I put a one-day-a-week job in the bin. One is three days a week, and the
other casual—a half day or evening as required and no work (and no income)
during school holidays. And I’m about to
begin volunteer tutoring with AMES. Piecing it together won’t be easy.
Tomorrow I go to an interview
for the casual job. It won’t pay the mortgage, no matter how many half days or
evenings I work. Two days a week of reliable uninterrupted income would keep me
afloat, with my business just bridging the gap. The business is irregular but up
till now it just covers times when the bank balance nudges empty or a big bill crops
up.
It’s a strange society where so
many complain of being asked to work too long, while many of the rest of us try
to manipulate work modules into a mosaic that helps us picture exactly who we
are. Andrew tells me he struggles with it.
In 2003 I work Monday,
Wednesday and Friday in community health and Tuesday and Thursday in tertiary
education. No two days of continuous identity. Both jobs suffer and so do I. Now
instead of being two workers, I might end up being four.
Rock on.
1 comment:
This is a little depressing. Makes me feel like pissing off with a backpack and walking till I die, somewhere, far away.
Post a Comment